Political Science

The escalation of violence and conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq remains to be an essential issue shaping American public opinion and the process of socialization. These corresponding issues surrounding the protection of national interests against threats of terrorism split the population in not only determining its validity surrounding the countrys capacity. At the same time, it also infuses questions surrounding the overall theme of these campaigns still coincides with American ideals.

One essential question surrounding this issue surrounds the appropriate interpretation towards acts of aggressiveness against Iraq and Afghanistan. For detractors, it questions the legality and validity of this claim and arguing towards vested interests rather than the overall conditions for the protection of democracy and maintenance of peace (Behran, 2007). On the other hand, there are also supporters who constantly see this process as an opportunity to develop Western ideals of democracy and freedom towards societies who do not believe in such ideology.

Seeing this, the ability to convey appropriate actions and setting the parameters on what is applicable becomes a questionable feat. In this manner, it tries to develop particular patterns that enable Americans to become divided over this issue and allow individual and collective principles to shape public opinion (Shaw, 2009). This then becomes an essential component that identifies the role of the U.S. not only within its territories but also in the protection of its interests internationally.

In the end, unless the government can set the lines surrounding its military campaigns in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the public will continuously be divided into arguing for and against this policy. Thus, instead of creating an utmost policy concerning protection of its territory and interests, it can become highly politicized and devalue the idea of democracy as a principle.

The development of a two-party system in the United States corresponds to a rich history that has showcased the interplay of politics and social conventions altogether. It is through such ability to corroborate with the existing trends in American society that the fundamental aspect of a two-party system continued to prevalent within the political sphere. This then brought about considerable avenues not only in establishing control but also diversifying the scope and application of issues along these two lines accordingly.

Analyzing the ability of the two-party system to endure in the United States, it can be argued that it has undergone numerous changes and shifts through the years to adjust to the needs of American society. Despite the corresponding nature of a federal setup, these two dominant parties sought to outline their policies in a more comprehensive and holistic manner (Pearson Education, 2006). In particular, they are not relatively specialized entities targeting a particular issue. Rather, the two-party system that America has comprises of central committees that handles all these issues altogether.

Due to this, the result is that it created a deep and comprehensive approach in handling political, social, and economic interests of the Americans accordingly. The only thing that differentiates between these two is the manner on how they correspond and respond to these facets accordingly and prioritizing in what they believe is crucial and relevant (Pearson Education, 2006).

Seeing this, the two-process system in the United States would likely to continue because it has been deeply embedded within the political processes. Forming new parties will be difficult to achieve because of the limited capacity of its members to put forward its policy and directives without addressing the interests of these two (Pearson Education, 2006). This then makes it difficult to survive especially if a particular attempt is vested on a sole interest alone.